Concurrent Gabapentin and Opioid Use and Risk of Mortality in Medicare Recipients with Non-Cancer Pain.

Gabapentin is prescribed for pain and is perceived as safe generally. However, gabapentin can cause respiratory depression, exacerbated by concomitant central nervous system depressants (e.g., opioids), a concern for vulnerable populations. We compared mortality rates among new users of either gabapentin or duloxetine with or without concurrent opioids in the 20% Medicare sample. We conducted a new-user design retrospective cohort study, in Medicare enrollees ages 65-89 years with noncancer chronic pain and no severe illness who filled prescriptions between 2015 and 2018 for gabapentin (n = 233,060) or duloxetine (n = 34,009). Daily opioid doses, estimated in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), were classified into none, low (0 < MME < 50), and high (≥ 50 MME), based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. The outcomes were all-cause mortality (primary) and out-of-hospital mortality (secondary). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences between gabapentin and duloxetine users. During 116,707 person-years of follow-up, 1,379 patients died. All-cause mortality rate in gabapentin users was 12.16 per 1,000 person-years vs. 9.94 per 1,000 in duloxetine users. Risks were similar for users with no concurrent opioids (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.31) or low-dose daily opioids (aHR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.63-1.76). However, gabapentin users receiving concurrent high-dose daily opioids had an increased rate of all-cause mortality compared with duloxetine users on high-dose opioids (aHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.19-3.46). Out-of-hospital mortality yielded similar results. In this retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries, concurrent use of high-dose opioids and gabapentin was associated with a higher all-cause mortality risk than that for concurrent use of high-dose opioids and duloxetine.

Duloxetine, Gabapentin, and the Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Out-of-Hospital Death in Medicare Beneficiaries With Non-Cancer Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor prescribed for musculoskeletal and other forms of chronic pain. Its dual pharmacologic properties have the potential to either raise or lower cardiovascular risk: adrenergic activity may increase the risk for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke, but antiplatelet activity may decrease risk. Gabapentin is another nonopioid medication used to treat pain, which is not thought to have adrenergic/antiplatelet effects. With the current emphasis on the use of nonopioid medications to treat patients with chronic pain, assessing cardiovascular risks associated with these medications among high-risk patients is important. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among a 20% sample of Medicare enrollees, aged 65 to 89, with chronic pain who were new users between 2015 and 2018 of either duloxetine (n = 34,009) or gabapentin (n = 233,060). We excluded individuals with cancer or other life-threatening conditions at study drug initiation. The primary outcome was a composite of AMI, stroke, and out-of-hospital mortality. We adjusted for comorbidity differences with time-dependent inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: During 115,668 person-years of follow-up, 2361 patients had the composite primary outcome; the rate among new users of duloxetine was 16.7/1000 person-years compared with new users of gabapentin (21.1/1000 person-years), adjusted hazard ratio = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.16). Results were similar for the individual components of the composite outcome as well as in analyses stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics. DISCUSSION: In summary, cohort Medicare patients with non-cancer pain beginning treatment with duloxetine had rates of AMI, stroke, and out-of-hospital mortality comparable to those who initiated gabapentin.

Association Between Genetically Predicted Expression of TPMT and Azathioprine Adverse Events.

Polymorphisms thiopurine-S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) can increase the risk of azathioprine myelotoxicity, but little is known about other genetic factors that increase risk for azathioprine-associated side effects. PrediXcan is a gene-based association method that estimates the expression of individuals' genes and examines their correlation to specified phenotypes. As proof of concept for using PrediXcan as a tool to define the association between genetic factors and azathioprine side effects, we aimed to determine whether the genetically predicted expression of TPMT or NUDT15 was associated with leukopenia or other known side effects. In a retrospective cohort of 1364 new users of azathioprine with EHR-reported White race, we used PrediXcan to impute expression in liver tissue, tested its association with pre-specified phecodes representing known side effects (e.g., skin cancer), and completed chart review to confirm cases. Among confirmed cases, patients in the lowest tertile (i.e., lowest predicted) of TPMT expression had significantly higher odds of developing leukopenia (OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.07-10.20, p=0.04) versus those in the highest tertile; no other side effects were significant. The results suggest that this methodology could be deployed on a larger scale to uncover associations between genetic factors and drug side effects for more personalized care.

Race, Genotype, and Azathioprine Discontinuation : A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are an important class of immunosuppressants despite their risk for hematopoietic toxicity and narrow therapeutic indices. Benign neutropenia related to an ACKR1 variant (rs2814778-CC) is common among persons of African ancestries. OBJECTIVE: To test whether rs2814778-CC was associated with azathioprine discontinuation attributed to hematopoietic toxicity and lower thiopurine dosing. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: Thiopurine users with White or Black race. MEASUREMENTS: Azathioprine discontinuation attributed to hematopoietic toxicity. Secondary outcomes included weight-adjusted final dose, leukocyte count, and change in leukocyte count. RESULTS: The rate of azathioprine discontinuation attributed to hematopoietic toxicity was 3.92 per 100 person-years among patients with the CC genotype (n = 101) and 1.34 per 100 person-years among those with the TT or TC genotype (n = 1365) (hazard ratio [HR] from competing-risk model, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.57 to 5.41]). The risk remained significant after adjustment for race (HR, 2.61 [CI, 1.01 to 6.71]). The risk associated with race alone (HR, 2.13 [CI, 1.21 to 3.75]) was abrogated by adjustment for genotype (HR, 1.13 [CI, 0.48 to 2.69]). Lower last leukocyte count and lower dosing were significant among patients with the CC genotype. Lower dosing was validated in an external cohort of 94 children of African ancestries prescribed the thiopurine 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The CC genotype was independently associated with lower 6-MP dose intensity relative to the target daily dose of 75 mg/m2 (median, 0.83 [IQR, 0.70 to 0.94] for the CC genotype vs. 0.94 [IQR, 0.72 to 1.13] for the TT or TC genotype; P = 0.013). LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounding; data limited to tertiary centers. CONCLUSION: Patients with the CC genotype had higher risk for azathioprine discontinuation attributed to hematopoietic toxicity and lower thiopurine doses. Genotype was associated with those risks, even after adjustment for race. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.